Building with Rust: Lessons from TaskRush Development

Developing TaskRush in Rust was both a technical challenge and a learning journey. Here's what we discovered along the way.

Why Rust for TaskRush?

When we started TaskRush, we evaluated several languages:

• Go: Great for simplicity, but lacks some advanced type system features
• C++: Powerful but memory management concerns for a CLI tool
• Node.js: Excellent async support but performance limitations
• Rust: Perfect balance of performance, safety, and modern language features

Rust won because TaskRush needed to be:

1. Fast: Users expect instant task execution
2. Reliable: Build tools can't crash or have memory leaks
3. Concurrent: Modern workflows require parallel processing

Key Design Decisions

Async-First Architecture

We built TaskRush around Tokio from day one:

#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> Result<()> {
    let config = load_config().await?;
    let runner = TaskRunner::new(config);
    runner.execute().await
}

This decision enabled natural async task execution without callback hell or complex state management.

Type-Safe Configuration

Using serde for configuration parsing provided compile-time guarantees:

#[derive(Deserialize)]
struct TaskConfig {
    command: String,
    depends: Vec<String>,
    parallel: bool,
    #[serde(default)]
    timeout: Option<Duration>,
}

Invalid configurations are caught early, preventing runtime errors.

Error Handling with anyhow

Rather than defining custom error types for everything, we used anyhow for ergonomic error handling:

use anyhow::{Context, Result};

fn execute_task(task: &Task) -> Result<()> {
    let output = Command::new(&task.command)
        .output()
        .context("Failed to execute task command")?;
    
    if !output.status.success() {
        anyhow::bail!("Task failed with exit code: {}", 
                     output.status.code().unwrap_or(-1));
    }
    
    Ok(())
}

Challenges We Faced

Async Trait Objects

One of Rust's current limitations is async in traits. We worked around this using the async-trait crate:

#[async_trait]
trait TaskExecutor {
    async fn execute(&self, task: &Task) -> Result<TaskResult>;
}

Dependency Resolution

Building a robust dependency graph required careful lifetime management:

struct DependencyGraph<'a> {
    tasks: HashMap<&'a str, &'a Task>,
    resolved: HashSet<&'a str>,
}

Cross-Platform Compatibility

Making TaskRush work across Windows, macOS, and Linux required platform-specific code:

#[cfg(windows)]
fn spawn_process(cmd: &str) -> Command {
    Command::new("cmd").args(["/C", cmd])
}

#[cfg(not(windows))]
fn spawn_process(cmd: &str) -> Command {
    Command::new("sh").args(["-c", cmd])
}

Performance Insights

Memory Usage

Rust's zero-cost abstractions meant TaskRush uses minimal memory:

• Baseline: ~2MB RAM usage
• Complex project: ~8MB RAM usage
• Comparable Go tool: ~25MB RAM usage

Execution Speed

Async execution provides excellent performance:

• Serial tasks: 2x faster than shell scripts
• Parallel tasks: 4x faster than traditional make
• Dependency resolution: Near-instantaneous

Best Practices We Learned

1. Start with tokio::main

Even for CLI tools, async provides better resource utilization.

2. Use clap for CLI parsing

Derive macros make command-line interfaces effortless:

#[derive(Parser)]
#[command(about = "High-performance task runner")]
struct Cli {
    #[command(subcommand)]
    command: Command,
}

3. Embrace Result<T> everywhere

Don't panic in library code. Return Results and let callers decide.

4. Use tracing for observability

Better than println! debugging:

#[tracing::instrument]
async fn execute_task(task: &Task) -> Result<()> {
    tracing::info!("Starting task: {}", task.name);
    // ... implementation
}

Community Response

The Rust community's response to TaskRush has been overwhelmingly positive:

• Downloads: 1,000+ crates.io downloads in first month
• GitHub Stars: 50+ stars and growing
• Contributions: 5 community contributors already

What's Next?

Our Rust journey with TaskRush continues:

1. Plugin System: Dynamic loading of task extensions
2. WebAssembly: Running tasks in browser environments
3. Distributed Execution: Running tasks across multiple machines
4. Performance Monitoring: Built-in profiling and metrics

Conclusion

Rust exceeded our expectations for TaskRush development. The combination of performance, safety, and modern language features made it the perfect choice for a tool that developers rely on daily.

The learning curve exists, but the payoff is enormous: software that's fast, reliable, and maintainable.

---

Want to contribute to TaskRush? Check out our GitHub repository or join the discussion in our issues.